首页> 外文OA文献 >Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2-Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial.
【2h】

Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2-Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial.

机译:超薄支杆可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与经皮冠状动脉血运重建的耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架:BIOSCIENCE试验的2年结果。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: No data are available on the long-term performance of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SES). We reported 2-year clinical outcomes of the BIOSCIENCE (Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularisation) trial, which compared BP-SES with durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 2119 patients with minimal exclusion criteria were assigned to treatment with BP-SES (n=1063) or DP-EES (n=1056). Follow-up at 2 years was available for 2048 patients (97%). The primary end point was target-lesion failure, a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization. At 2 years, target-lesion failure occurred in 107 patients (10.5%) in the BP-SES arm and 107 patients (10.4%) in the DP-EES arm (risk ratio [RR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.77-1.31, P=0.979). There were no significant differences between BP-SES and DP-EES with respect to cardiac death (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.62-1.63, P=0.984), target-vessel myocardial infarction (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.60-1.39, P=0.669), target-lesion revascularization (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.81-1.71, P=0.403), and definite stent thrombosis (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.56-3.44, P=0.485). There were 2 cases (0.2%) of definite very late stent thrombosis in the BP-SES arm and 4 cases (0.4%) in the DP-EES arm (P=0.423). In the prespecified subgroup of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, BP-SES was associated with a lower risk of target-lesion failure compared with DP-EES (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.23-0.99, P=0.043, Pinteraction=0.026).CONCLUSIONS: Comparable safety and efficacy profiles of BP-SES and DP-EES were maintained throughout 2 years of follow-up.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01443104.
机译:背景:目前尚无关于超薄支撑杆可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架(BP-SES)的长期性能的数据。我们报告了BIOSCIENCE(超短程Strut可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与经皮冠状动脉血运重建的耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架相比)的2年临床结果,该试验将BP-SES与耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架(DP-EES)进行了比较方法和结果:共有2119名具有最低排除标准的患者被分配接受BP-SES(n = 1063)或DP-EES(n = 1056)的治疗。 2048位患者(97%)可以进行2年的随访。主要终点是靶病变失败,心源性死亡,靶血管心肌梗塞或临床指示的靶病变血运重建的复合物。在2年时,BP-SES组中有107例患者(10.5%)发生了目标病变失败,DP-EES组中有107例患者(10.4%)发生了病变(风险比[RR] 1.00,95%CI 0.77-1.31, P = 0.979)。 BP-SES和DP-EES在心源性死亡(RR 1.01,95%CI 0.62-1.63,P = 0.984),靶血管性心肌梗塞(RR 0.91,95%CI 0.60-1.39, P = 0.669),靶病变血运重建(RR 1.17,95%CI 0.81-1.71,P = 0.403)和明确的支架血栓形成(RR 1.38,95%CI 0.56-3.44,P = 0.485)。 BP-SES组有2例(0.2%)明确的晚期支架血栓形成,DP-EES组有4例(0.4%)(P = 0.423)。在预先确定的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者亚组中,与DP-EES相比,BP-SES的靶病变失败风险较低(RR 0.48,95%CI 0.23-0.99,P = 0.043,Pinteraction = 0.026)。结论:在随访的2年中,维持了BP-SES和DP-EES的可比性安全性和有效性概况。临床试验注册:URL:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT01443104。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号